Triple
T36066773
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ross |
E1043253
|
entity |
| Predicate | historicalCountyPartOf |
P103366
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ross and Cromarty |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ross and Cromarty | Statement: [Ross, historicalCountyPartOf, Ross and Cromarty]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicalCountyPartOf Context triple: [Ross, historicalCountyPartOf, Ross and Cromarty]
-
A.
historicalCounty
Indicates that an entity was located within or associated with a county as it existed in the past, even if that county’s boundaries or administrative status have since changed.
-
B.
historicCountyPart
chosen
Indicates that one entity forms a constituent part or subdivision of a historic county.
-
C.
historicalCountyContext
Indicates the relationship between an entity and the historical county or county-level jurisdiction within which it was situated or to which it belonged during a specified past time period.
-
D.
historicCountyPredecessor
Indicates that one historic county served as a predecessor or earlier form of another historic county in an administrative or territorial succession.
-
E.
hasAssociatedHistoricCounty
Indicates that an entity is linked to a specific historic county with which it is geographically or administratively associated.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e2fd3248190b900d9a492bf5a7a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a00d9717a9881908194163d719f14d6 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a00d91db2ec81909ebacfc9f0d11dd8 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 7:14 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:08 p.m.