Triple

T36064390
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mansi Ganga E1043178 entity
Predicate consideredNonDifferentFrom P142622 FINISHED
Object Ganga River NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ganga River | Statement: [Mansi Ganga, consideredNonDifferentFrom, Ganga River]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: consideredNonDifferentFrom
Context triple: [Mansi Ganga, consideredNonDifferentFrom, Ganga River]
  • A. lessSimilarTo
    Indicates that one entity is considered to share fewer similarities or a weaker resemblance with another entity compared to some reference or alternative.
  • B. isDistinctFrom
    Indicates that two entities are not identical and can be clearly distinguished from one another.
  • C. usedToBeSameAs
    Indicates that two entities were identical or represented the same thing at some point in the past, but no longer do.
  • D. isDynamicallyDistinctFrom
    Indicates that two entities differ in their behavior, state changes, or evolution over time, even if they may appear similar in static properties.
  • E. isNotKnownToBeEquivalentTo chosen
    Indicates that there is no established or recognized evidence that one entity is equivalent to another.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e2f09448190b0486d5ecad5e243 completed May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7b69b333081909cadbed3fcb8ecf5 completed May 3, 2026, 8:56 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7b4c2a5f8819094ad4621d7b97e0c completed May 3, 2026, 8:49 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:08 p.m.