Triple

T36054486
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Harry Potter's wand E1042905 entity
Predicate twinCoreWith P53361 FINISHED
Object Lord Voldemort's wand LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lord Voldemort's wand | Statement: [Harry Potter's wand, twinCoreWith, Lord Voldemort's wand]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: twinCoreWith
Context triple: [Harry Potter's wand, twinCoreWith, Lord Voldemort's wand]
  • A. twinType
    Indicates that one entity is classified as a specific type or category of twin in relation to another entity.
  • B. twinning
    Indicates that two entities are paired or linked as twins, typically sharing a formally recognized, parallel, or closely matched relationship.
  • C. isTwinWith
    Indicates that two entities are twins, sharing the same birth parents and being born at (or very near) the same time.
  • D. hasTwinFeature chosen
    Indicates that two entities share an identical or nearly identical feature, characteristic, or component, as if they are twins in that respect.
  • E. hasTwinSystemWith
    Indicates that two systems are twins, meaning they are closely paired or mirrored counterparts in structure, function, or configuration.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e2f09448190b0486d5ecad5e243 completed May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7b2c771108190adeec151daad5dab completed May 3, 2026, 8:40 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7b1bad2e88190963ab4ee5d4f2038 completed May 3, 2026, 8:36 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:08 p.m.