Triple

T36050675
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Institutional framework of ECOWAS E1042799 entity
Predicate coordinatesPolicyAreas P184512 FINISHED
Object trade LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: trade | Statement: [Institutional framework of ECOWAS, coordinatesPolicyAreas, trade]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: coordinatesPolicyAreas
Context triple: [Institutional framework of ECOWAS, coordinatesPolicyAreas, trade]
  • A. coversPolicyArea
    Indicates that a policy, document, or initiative includes or addresses a particular policy area or topic within its scope.
  • B. coordinatesGovernmentPolicyIn
    Indicates that an entity organizes, aligns, or manages government policy activities within a specified location or jurisdiction.
  • C. commonPolicyArea
    Indicates that two entities share the same policy domain, topic, or area of regulatory or legislative focus.
  • D. hasPolicyArea
    Indicates that an entity (such as a policy, program, or initiative) is associated with or pertains to a specific policy area or domain.
  • E. policyAreaScope
    Indicates the specific policy domain or thematic area to which an action, decision, or measure is relevant or applies.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e2e41f8819091f9fb0536920fec completed May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7b35e32d481909ef0220e6f6ff4a8 completed May 3, 2026, 8:43 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7b1bad2e88190963ab4ee5d4f2038 completed May 3, 2026, 8:36 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f7b2c66054819083897e25edb65ba7 completed May 3, 2026, 8:40 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:07 p.m.