Triple
T36045883
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Thakri language |
E1042668
|
entity |
| Predicate | linguisticClassificationCertainty |
P184507
|
FINISHED |
| Object | uncertain details |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: uncertain details | Statement: [Thakri language, linguisticClassificationCertainty, uncertain details]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: linguisticClassificationCertainty Context triple: [Thakri language, linguisticClassificationCertainty, uncertain details]
-
A.
linguisticClassification
Indicates the relationship by which an entity is categorized according to its language or linguistic type.
-
B.
linguisticClassificationBasis
Indicates the criterion or principle used as the basis for classifying something within a linguistic system or framework.
-
C.
linguisticClassificationDebatedBy
Indicates that the linguistic classification of something is a subject of disagreement or debate among specified parties.
-
D.
linguisticClassificationNote
Indicates a note providing additional information or commentary about how something is linguistically classified.
-
E.
hasLinguisticClassificationSource
Indicates the source or reference from which a linguistic classification has been derived or documented.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e2e41f8819091f9fb0536920fec |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7b35e32d481909ef0220e6f6ff4a8 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:43 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7b1bad2e88190963ab4ee5d4f2038 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:36 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f7b2c66054819083897e25edb65ba7 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:40 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:07 p.m.