Triple
T36036145
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lupaus |
E1042403
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMusicalScoreBy |
P77605
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Tuomas Kantelinen |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tuomas Kantelinen | Statement: [Lupaus, hasMusicalScoreBy, Tuomas Kantelinen]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMusicalScoreBy Context triple: [Lupaus, hasMusicalScoreBy, Tuomas Kantelinen]
-
A.
hasNoMusicalScore
Indicates that something lacks an associated musical score or written musical accompaniment.
-
B.
hasMusicalComposer
Indicates that one entity serves as the musical composer responsible for creating the music associated with another entity.
-
C.
isMusicalWorkFor
Indicates that a musical work is created, intended, or designated for a particular entity, such as an instrument, performer, event, or context.
-
D.
musicScoreBy
chosen
Indicates that a musical score was created or composed by a particular agent or entity.
-
E.
hasMusicalWorkType
Indicates that a musical work is associated with a specific type or category of musical composition.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e2d7e8c8190bac4e90734566799 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe78e545888190a239af1a84280fa0 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 11:59 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe7842742081908043eb950ed69f92 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 11:56 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:07 p.m.