Triple
T35987557
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 2004 World Rally Championship |
E1040753
|
entity |
| Predicate | runnersUpConstructor |
P184925
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Subaru |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Subaru | Statement: [2004 World Rally Championship, runnersUpConstructor, Subaru]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: runnersUpConstructor Context triple: [2004 World Rally Championship, runnersUpConstructor, Subaru]
-
A.
runnerUpManager
Indicates that one entity serves as the manager or coach of another entity who finished as the runner-up in a competition or ranking.
-
B.
conferenceOfRunnerUp
Indicates the conference or league affiliation to which the runner-up entity belongs.
-
C.
finishedRunnersUpIn
Indicates that one entity concluded a competition or contest in the runners-up position relative to another entity or event.
-
D.
runnersUpCoDriver
Indicates that the co-driver finished in a runners-up (non-winning but top) position in a competition or event.
-
E.
runnerUpWins
Indicates that an entity finishes in second place in a competition or ranking and receives the corresponding runner-up victory or award.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e28293c8190ae3f4e2208b87117 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7b69b333081909cadbed3fcb8ecf5 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:56 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7b4c2a5f8819094ad4621d7b97e0c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:49 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f7b69a74a08190b31b1201278a2c57 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:56 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:07 p.m.