Triple

T35981201
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Silvertails E1040566 entity
Predicate appliesToReputation P159475 FINISHED
Object successful club LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: successful club | Statement: [Silvertails, appliesToReputation, successful club]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appliesToReputation
Context triple: [Silvertails, appliesToReputation, successful club]
  • A. associatedWithReputation
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is linked to, influenced by, or characterized in terms of another entity’s reputation or perceived standing.
  • B. reputationUsedFor chosen
    Indicates that an entity’s reputation is leveraged or applied for a particular purpose, function, or outcome.
  • C. denotesReputationOf
    Indicates that one entity represents, expresses, or serves as an indicator of the reputation or perceived standing of another entity.
  • D. haveReputation
    Indicates that an entity is recognized or regarded in a certain way by others, reflecting its perceived character, quality, or status.
  • E. providesReputationWith
    Indicates that one entity grants or assigns a reputation value, score, or status to another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e28293c8190ae3f4e2208b87117 completed May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ff53389a0481908b2baeb43c6294f0 completed May 9, 2026, 3:31 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ff52e2b4b88190b38d160d771fe14b completed May 9, 2026, 3:29 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:07 p.m.