Triple

T35977838
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Rosh Galut E1040471 entity
Predicate lineagePrinciple P118185 FINISHED
Object patrilineal descent LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: patrilineal descent | Statement: [Rosh Galut, lineagePrinciple, patrilineal descent]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: lineagePrinciple
Context triple: [Rosh Galut, lineagePrinciple, patrilineal descent]
  • A. lineageSystem
    Indicates a hierarchical ancestry or descent relationship that traces how entities are derived from or originate through one another within a system.
  • B. lineageConcept chosen
    Indicates a conceptual or abstract relationship of lineage, such as ancestry or descent, between entities.
  • C. importantLineage
    Indicates that one entity’s ancestry, heritage, or familial line is considered especially significant or influential in relation to another entity or context.
  • D. lineageRelatedTo
    Indicates a relationship where two entities are connected through a line of descent or ancestry within the same lineage.
  • E. lineageClaim
    Indicates a claim or assertion that one entity is descended from, or belongs to the ancestral line of, another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e27758c81909b711cf38a130aaf completed May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7acaec1508190a38f2ac9cc5383e7 completed May 3, 2026, 8:14 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7ab75387c819091afc3c2128eb903 completed May 3, 2026, 8:09 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:07 p.m.