Triple
T35934193
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rural Municipality of Excelsior No. 166 |
E1039249
|
entity |
| Predicate | followsProvincialLaw |
P196072
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Saskatchewan law |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Saskatchewan law | Statement: [Rural Municipality of Excelsior No. 166, followsProvincialLaw, Saskatchewan law]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: followsProvincialLaw Context triple: [Rural Municipality of Excelsior No. 166, followsProvincialLaw, Saskatchewan law]
-
A.
hasProvincialLaw
chosen
Indicates that a jurisdiction or entity is governed by, or subject to, a specific provincial-level law.
-
B.
appliesLocalLaw
Indicates that a legal rule, decision, or authority is governed by and enforced under the laws of a specific local jurisdiction.
-
C.
provincialLevelJurisdiction
Indicates that an entity has legal or administrative authority at the provincial (subnational) level within a country.
-
D.
isProvincial
Indicates that something belongs to, is characteristic of, or is administered at the level of a province rather than a national or local level.
-
E.
localLawRepresentedBy
Indicates that a specific local law is formally represented, expressed, or captured by a particular legal document, code section, or representation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e23e4688190a5369138755138bf |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff1f3f94fc819095955299f50ab4ce |
completed | May 9, 2026, 11:49 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff1ea47748819082f63d9b9d9c3e65 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 11:46 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:07 p.m.