Triple

T35922589
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject regent honeyeater E1038925 entity
Predicate historicalRangeIncluded P132119 FINISHED
Object South Australia NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: South Australia | Statement: [regent honeyeater, historicalRangeIncluded, South Australia]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicalRangeIncluded
Context triple: [regent honeyeater, historicalRangeIncluded, South Australia]
  • A. historicalRangeIncludes chosen
    Indicates that the temporal span or period associated with one entity encompasses the historical time range of another entity.
  • B. historicalRange
    Indicates the time period over which something existed, was active, or was relevant in history.
  • C. historicalRangeType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of historical time span or period associated with an entity or event.
  • D. hasHistoryPeriod
    Indicates that something is associated with, belongs to, or occurs within a specific historical period or era.
  • E. containsHistoricPeriod
    Indicates that one entity encompasses or includes a specific historic period within its temporal or contextual scope.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e2320748190b7f5c4750d0cd0d3 completed May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a00ca5e907481909d391afd55938a1b completed May 10, 2026, 6:11 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a00ca2214348190a674a85ede709e2e completed May 10, 2026, 6:10 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:07 p.m.