Triple

T35918422
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Vajrasattva E1038809 entity
Predicate equivalentInJapanese P57913 FINISHED
Object Kongōsatta NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Kongōsatta | Statement: [Vajrasattva, equivalentInJapanese, Kongōsatta]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: equivalentInJapanese
Context triple: [Vajrasattva, equivalentInJapanese, Kongōsatta]
  • A. equivalentInJapaneseKanji
    Indicates that one entity has the same meaning or value as another entity when written in Japanese Kanji.
  • B. hasMeaningInJapanese
    Indicates that something (such as a word, phrase, or symbol) possesses a specific meaning when interpreted in the Japanese language.
  • C. equivalentTitleInJapanese chosen
    Indicates that one entity has a corresponding or matching title in Japanese that is equivalent in meaning or usage to the other entity’s title.
  • D. languageEquivalent
    Indicates that two linguistic expressions convey the same meaning or function across different languages or language varieties.
  • E. equivalentIn
    Indicates that two entities are considered logically or functionally the same in meaning, status, or effect within a given context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e2320748190b7f5c4750d0cd0d3 completed May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7ac23d1388190bdf9628b294943bd completed May 3, 2026, 8:12 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7ab734d848190a84f9b8c3a952b75 completed May 3, 2026, 8:09 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:07 p.m.