Triple
T35917924
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Flowing Hair dollar |
E1038796
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalTenderAtIssue |
P200811
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Flowing Hair dollar, legalTenderAtIssue, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalTenderAtIssue Context triple: [Flowing Hair dollar, legalTenderAtIssue, yes]
-
A.
legalTenderUse
Indicates the use or acceptance of something as official legal tender for payment or settlement of obligations.
-
B.
legalTenderSupported
Indicates that a given currency or payment method is officially recognized and accepted as legal tender within a specified jurisdiction or context.
-
C.
wasLegalTender
Indicates that something was officially recognized as valid money for settling debts or transactions within a particular jurisdiction and time period.
-
D.
isLegalTenderFor
Indicates that a particular currency or form of money is officially recognized by a governing authority as valid payment for debts and financial transactions within a specified jurisdiction.
-
E.
legalTenderInSuccessorState
Indicates that a form of money continues to be officially accepted as legal tender within a state that has succeeded another state.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e2320748190b7f5c4750d0cd0d3 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ffada24d188190a576a02dc280a7fb |
completed | May 9, 2026, 9:56 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ffad46d6ac819081772f408b1389d5 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 9:55 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ffada149748190916bfd9b87356342 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 9:56 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:07 p.m.