Triple

T35864020
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lydian pantheon E1037031 entity
Predicate sharesDeityTypesWith P202328 FINISHED
Object Greek pantheon LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Greek pantheon | Statement: [Lydian pantheon, sharesDeityTypesWith, Greek pantheon]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: sharesDeityTypesWith
Context triple: [Lydian pantheon, sharesDeityTypesWith, Greek pantheon]
  • A. sharesDeitiesWith
    Indicates that two entities have one or more deities in common within their respective religious or mythological systems.
  • B. deityCategory
    Indicates that one entity is classified as belonging to a particular category or type of deity in relation to another entity.
  • C. deityIdentification
    Indicates that one entity is identified, recognized, or designated as a deity in relation to another entity or context.
  • D. hasDeityGroup
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is associated with, or belongs to, a particular group or pantheon of deities.
  • E. typeOfDeity
    Indicates that one entity is classified as a specific kind or category of deity in relation to another.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e1d279c8190843e5b64a0a12c3f completed May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a007241df8081909dbad651fda82aa7 completed May 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0071e77ed081908cd618da8977d878 completed May 10, 2026, 11:54 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_6a007240adac819087ab65e9733c384f completed May 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:06 p.m.