Triple

T35862769
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject HNS E1036997 entity
Predicate hasLanguageIndependentCode P33278 FINISHED
Object HNS LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: HNS | Statement: [HNS, hasLanguageIndependentCode, HNS]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLanguageIndependentCode
Context triple: [HNS, hasLanguageIndependentCode, HNS]
  • A. isLanguageIndependent chosen
    Indicates that the relationship, property, or behavior holds true regardless of the specific natural language used to express or encode it.
  • B. hasLanguageIndependentName
    Indicates that an entity possesses a name or label that is the same across all languages, not tied to any specific linguistic form.
  • C. isProgrammingLanguageIndependent
    Indicates that something (such as a concept, algorithm, or interface) does not depend on any specific programming language and can be applied or used across different languages.
  • D. hasCodeIn
    Indicates that one entity is represented, defined, or implemented within the codebase or coding context of another entity.
  • E. hasLinguisticCode
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific linguistic identifier or code (such as a language or script code) that characterizes its linguistic properties.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e1d279c8190843e5b64a0a12c3f completed May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ff9bed58dc8190a204816d4ed6c32c completed May 9, 2026, 8:41 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ff9b69653c81908ab0d88055a66a88 completed May 9, 2026, 8:39 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:06 p.m.