Triple

T35847040
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject California Love E1036240 entity
Predicate vocalEffectUsed P110805 FINISHED
Object talk box LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: talk box | Statement: [California Love, vocalEffectUsed, talk box]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: vocalEffectUsed
Context triple: [California Love, vocalEffectUsed, talk box]
  • A. vocalEffects
    Indicates that one entity applies or produces specific modifications, enhancements, or stylistic effects on another entity’s vocal sound or performance.
  • B. hasHookVocalStyle
    Indicates that an entity (typically a musical work or performance) features a distinctive, catchy vocal delivery or refrain intended to serve as a memorable hook.
  • C. usesVocalSamples
    Indicates that one entity incorporates recorded vocal sounds from another source into its own audio or musical production.
  • D. hasVocalProcessing chosen
    Indicates that an entity’s vocal audio has been altered or enhanced through some form of signal processing.
  • E. usesVocalOverdubbing
    Indicates that one entity applies vocal overdubbing to another entity, layering additional recorded vocals over an existing audio track.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e1a29e8819088280f26096aeb55 completed May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7c29e1b848190b945c6c6120a5330 completed May 3, 2026, 9:48 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7c1b6e7a881908deb96bedb2713f4 completed May 3, 2026, 9:44 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:06 p.m.