Triple
T35814663
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Torres de Segre |
E1035324
|
entity |
| Predicate | inComarca |
P184152
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Segrià |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Segrià | Statement: [Torres de Segre, inComarca, Segrià]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: inComarca Context triple: [Torres de Segre, inComarca, Segrià]
-
A.
inAutonomousCommunity
Indicates that one entity is located within or belongs administratively to a specific autonomous community.
-
B.
autonomousCommunity
Indicates that one entity is an autonomous community (a self-governing territorial division) within the jurisdiction or structure of another entity.
-
C.
hasComarca
Indicates that one entity is associated with, or belongs to, a specific comarca (an administrative or territorial district).
-
D.
associatedAutonomousCommunity
Indicates a relationship where an entity is linked or belongs to a specific autonomous community as its relevant regional jurisdiction or affiliation.
-
E.
autonomousCounty
Indicates that a county possesses a degree of self-governance or political autonomy distinct from higher-level administrative authorities.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e1762408190b885a8456862e372 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7aaabb58c8190bf81673608ecfb6e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:06 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7a8d219f8819081dc4ce3c83ca0cb |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:58 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f7aa6795f481908940838ee7041ff5 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:04 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:06 p.m.