Triple
T35811948
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | სომხები |
E1035253
|
entity |
| Predicate | ეთნონიმი სომხურ ენაზე |
P58738
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Հայեր |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Հայեր | Statement: [სომხები, ეთნონიმი სომხურ ენაზე, Հայեր]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ეთნონიმი სომხურ ენაზე Context triple: [სომხები, ეთნონიმი სომხურ ენაზე, Հայեր]
-
A.
ethnonymInLanguage
chosen
Indicates that a given term is the name used in a specified language to refer to the people of a particular ethnic group or nationality.
-
B.
ethnonym
Indicates that one entity is the name of an ethnic group used to refer to the people associated with another entity.
-
C.
ethnonymSingular
Indicates that the subject is the singular form of an ethnonym (a name for a member of a specific ethnic or national group).
-
D.
isEthnonymic
Indicates that something (typically a name or term) is derived from or based on the name of an ethnic group or people.
-
E.
ethnonymLanguageFamily
Indicates a relationship where an ethnonym is associated with the language family traditionally spoken or linked to that ethnic group.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e1762408190b885a8456862e372 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7aa699d68819081ed363931894ab3 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:04 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7a8d219f8819081dc4ce3c83ca0cb |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:58 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:06 p.m.