Triple

T35807946
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject The Judgment Day E1035151 entity
Predicate hasFormerAssociate P112494 FINISHED
Object JD McDonagh NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: JD McDonagh | Statement: [The Judgment Day, hasFormerAssociate, JD McDonagh]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFormerAssociate
Context triple: [The Judgment Day, hasFormerAssociate, JD McDonagh]
  • A. hasFormerStaffMember
    Indicates that an entity once had a person as a staff member, but that person is no longer employed there.
  • B. hasFormerParticipant chosen
    Indicates that an entity once participated in an activity, event, or organization but is no longer a current participant.
  • C. hasFormerAffiliationOfLeader
    Indicates that an entity was previously affiliated with the organization or group to which a specified leader once belonged or led.
  • D. hasNotableFormerMemberRole
    Indicates that an entity has a role or position that was notably held by a former member of that entity.
  • E. holderIsFormer
    Indicates that the referenced holder previously had, but no longer has, the specified role, position, or status.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e1762408190b885a8456862e372 completed May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe72dca2f08190beff17de3d2aada6 completed May 8, 2026, 11:33 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe70bca8d08190b810e1e616ceac44 completed May 8, 2026, 11:24 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:06 p.m.