Triple

T3577921
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject ECHELON E75731 entity
Predicate allegedCapabilities P17736 FINISHED
Object global communications interception LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: global communications interception | Statement: [ECHELON, allegedCapabilities, global communications interception]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: allegedCapabilities
Context triple: [ECHELON, allegedCapabilities, global communications interception]
  • A. usedCapability
    Indicates that an entity employed or exercised a particular capability, skill, or function in performing an action or achieving a result.
  • B. consideredCapability chosen
    Indicates that something is regarded or evaluated as a potential capability of an entity.
  • C. requiresCapability
    Indicates that one entity depends on another entity possessing a specific capability in order for an action, function, or condition to be fulfilled.
  • D. isCapableOf
    Indicates that an entity has the ability or capacity to perform a particular action or function.
  • E. displayCapabilities
    Indicates the set of functions, features, or behaviors that an entity is able to present or support in a given context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85d5e3008190bdfe0bacdd1f5a1b completed March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adc0dd3e048190a0c6666e13ead9cd completed March 8, 2026, 6:33 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69adb83810c481909c645c08b978edc1 completed March 8, 2026, 5:56 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:21 p.m.