Triple

T3573985
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject FEROS spectrograph E75641 entity
Predicate hasCalibration P50659 FINISHED
Object ThAr comparison lamp LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ThAr comparison lamp | Statement: [FEROS spectrograph, hasCalibration, ThAr comparison lamp]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCalibration
Context triple: [FEROS spectrograph, hasCalibration, ThAr comparison lamp]
  • A. supportsHardwareCalibration
    Indicates that one entity provides the capability or functionality to perform calibration operations on another entity’s hardware.
  • B. calibratedFor
    Indicates that something has been adjusted or tuned to operate accurately or optimally for a specific target, condition, or context.
  • C. hasMeasurement
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific measured value, often including a unit or measurement context.
  • D. hasSensor
    Indicates that one entity is equipped with, contains, or uses a particular sensor.
  • E. hasMeter
    Indicates that one entity possesses, uses, or is associated with a specific meter (a measuring device or metrical pattern).
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85d5e3008190bdfe0bacdd1f5a1b completed March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adc0d928f08190830347b3b032178a completed March 8, 2026, 6:32 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69adb8364d848190a96a9bc7a6126af2 completed March 8, 2026, 5:56 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69adba25c66c81909a05a97327828c41 completed March 8, 2026, 6:04 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:21 p.m.