Triple

T35739368
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Galip E1032988 entity
Predicate closelyConnectedToMotif P134310 FINISHED
Object doubling and substitution of identities LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: doubling and substitution of identities | Statement: [Galip, closelyConnectedToMotif, doubling and substitution of identities]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: closelyConnectedToMotif
Context triple: [Galip, closelyConnectedToMotif, doubling and substitution of identities]
  • A. commonMotifRegion
    Indicates that two or more entities share a recurring motif within the same spatial or contextual region.
  • B. usesMotifsFrom
    Indicates that one entity incorporates or draws upon recurring themes, patterns, or elements that originate from another entity.
  • C. hasClosingMotif
    Indicates that one entity features or is associated with a recurring thematic or structural pattern used at the end or conclusion of another entity.
  • D. featuresMotif
    Indicates that something contains, incorporates, or prominently includes a particular recurring motif or pattern.
  • E. transformationMotif chosen
    Indicates a recurring pattern or theme in which one entity undergoes a change in form, state, or identity in relation to another.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e10e59081908d81ad9ce22f40b6 completed May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fccdd496048190bca801a8a9eecb62 completed May 7, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fcccee6240819084680887731ff64b completed May 7, 2026, 5:33 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:05 p.m.