Triple

T35662563
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject LM101 operational amplifier E1030475 entity
Predicate hasOffsetNullCapability P44399 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [LM101 operational amplifier, hasOffsetNullCapability, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasOffsetNullCapability
Context triple: [LM101 operational amplifier, hasOffsetNullCapability, true]
  • A. hasInputOffsetNullCapability chosen
    Indicates that an entity supports or is capable of handling input values that are null or have no offset.
  • B. hasOffsetNullPins
    Indicates that one entity has pins that are offset from a reference position and intentionally left unconnected or null.
  • C. hasOffset
    Indicates that one entity is displaced or shifted from another by a specified amount, distance, or position.
  • D. hasNullSet
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, contains, or is characterized by an empty or null set of elements.
  • E. nullValueSupport
    Indicates that the relationship or operation explicitly allows, handles, or preserves null (missing) values for the involved entities or attributes.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e09f87881909c954aaac176c34f completed May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fbbc49da8c8190902bbb05d2477cab completed May 6, 2026, 10:10 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fbb13f34b08190bbbb220ac1e6e666 completed May 6, 2026, 9:23 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:05 p.m.