Triple
T35627200
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | R (Countryside Alliance) v Attorney General |
E1029487
|
entity |
| Predicate | partyTypeOfClaimant |
P26870
|
FINISHED |
| Object | interest group |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: interest group | Statement: [R (Countryside Alliance) v Attorney General, partyTypeOfClaimant, interest group]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: partyTypeOfClaimant Context triple: [R (Countryside Alliance) v Attorney General, partyTypeOfClaimant, interest group]
-
A.
partyTypePlaintiffs
chosen
Indicates the classification or category of the parties serving as plaintiffs in a legal action.
-
B.
typeOfClaim
Indicates the specific category or nature of a claim being made in relation to an entity or statement.
-
C.
partyTypeOfRespondent
Indicates the specific legal or procedural role that the respondent plays as a party in a case or proceeding.
-
D.
subjectOfClaim
Indicates that an entity is the topic, target, or focus of a particular claim or assertion made by another entity.
-
E.
formerClaimant
Indicates that an entity previously held the status of claimant in a claim or dispute but no longer does so.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e07bb0c8190968ea2d836fc42c9 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f79f15e6ac8190916822e28724534a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f79e4bdbcc8190be7a0d2cf8a77b64 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:13 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:05 p.m.