Triple

T35626852
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Division of Adult Correction E1029479 entity
Predicate hasTypeOfOffenderSupervision P195857 FINISHED
Object incarceration LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: incarceration | Statement: [Division of Adult Correction, hasTypeOfOffenderSupervision, incarceration]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTypeOfOffenderSupervision
Context triple: [Division of Adult Correction, hasTypeOfOffenderSupervision, incarceration]
  • A. hasSupervisionType chosen
    Indicates the specific kind or category of supervision that one entity exercises over another.
  • B. targetOffenderType
    Indicates the specific category or type of offender that an action, rule, or condition is directed toward.
  • C. isForConvictedOffenders
    Indicates that something is intended to apply to, be used by, or be relevant for individuals who have been legally convicted of offenses.
  • D. typeOfConvict
    Indicates the specific category or classification of a convict in relation to their conviction or legal status.
  • E. hasCriminalPenalty
    Indicates that a specified action, condition, or violation is subject to punishment under criminal law.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e07bb0c8190968ea2d836fc42c9 completed May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ff84df768c81908c65a1a7e33103ad completed May 9, 2026, 7:02 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ff848d0af881908ee42c27a58af47e completed May 9, 2026, 7:01 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:05 p.m.