Triple

T35620590
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Clinton email controversy E1029301 entity
Predicate officeHolderInvolved P32048 FINISHED
Object Hillary Clinton NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hillary Clinton | Statement: [Clinton email controversy, officeHolderInvolved, Hillary Clinton]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: officeHolderInvolved
Context triple: [Clinton email controversy, officeHolderInvolved, Hillary Clinton]
  • A. involvesOfficeHolder chosen
    Indicates that the relationship or action includes or pertains to a person currently holding a specific office or official position.
  • B. officeHolderIs
    Indicates that one entity serves as the office holder (e.g., official or position occupant) of another entity, such as an office, role, or institution.
  • C. officeHolderMayBe
    Indicates that a specified person is permitted or eligible to hold a particular office or position.
  • D. involvedOfficer
    Indicates that an officer participated in, was connected to, or played a role in a particular incident, case, or event.
  • E. officeHoldersParticipateIn
    Indicates that individuals holding an office take part in or are involved in a specified event, activity, or process.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e0709408190bbe322bf1707ef6b completed May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ffef812da48190b875a7376b24f92d completed May 10, 2026, 2:37 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ffedecd580819097851b1473fdd6ed completed May 10, 2026, 2:31 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:05 p.m.