Triple

T3561196
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Roman Fountains E75341 entity
Predicate isSymmetrical P50368 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Roman Fountains, isSymmetrical, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isSymmetrical
Context triple: [Roman Fountains, isSymmetrical, true]
  • A. isSymmetricAbout
    Indicates that one entity is a mirror image of another with respect to a specified axis, point, or plane of symmetry.
  • B. isSymmetric
    Indicates that a relationship holds in both directions between two entities, so if it applies from A to B, it also applies from B to A.
  • C. testsSymmetry
    Indicates that one entity evaluates or verifies whether a relationship or property holds identically in both directions between two entities.
  • D. isMaximallySymmetric
    Indicates that the subject exhibits the highest possible degree of symmetry allowed by the relevant structure, constraints, or context.
  • E. localSymmetry
    Indicates that an entity exhibits symmetry within a localized region or subset of its structure, rather than across its entire extent.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85d45090819086f34fb85d850a1e completed March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adc08ac1b0819082021ecdd0061dc3 completed March 8, 2026, 6:31 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69adb834779081908468e182d5f6cf02 completed March 8, 2026, 5:56 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69adb9bbb62c8190989629ca11733e1b completed March 8, 2026, 6:02 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:21 p.m.