Triple
T35602620
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Connectivity Fault Management |
E1028797
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ethernet OAM mechanism |
C32663
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Ethernet OAM mechanism Context triple: [Connectivity Fault Management, instanceOf, Ethernet OAM mechanism]
-
A.
Ethernet OAM standard
chosen
The Ethernet OAM standard defines protocols and mechanisms for monitoring, fault management, and performance management in Ethernet networks to ensure reliable and maintainable service operation.
-
B.
Connectivity Fault Management standard
The Connectivity Fault Management standard defines protocols and mechanisms for detecting, isolating, and managing connectivity faults in Ethernet and packet-based networks to ensure reliable end-to-end service.
-
C.
VLAN encapsulation mechanism
A VLAN encapsulation mechanism is a method of tagging or wrapping Ethernet frames with VLAN identifiers (such as 802.1Q tags) to logically separate and manage network traffic across shared physical infrastructure.
-
D.
IEEE 802.21 feature set
The IEEE 802.21 feature set comprises mechanisms and protocols that enable seamless media-independent handover and service continuity across heterogeneous wireless and wired networks.
-
E.
Ethernet fronthaul standard
An Ethernet fronthaul standard defines the protocols, interfaces, and performance requirements for transporting radio access network (RAN) traffic between distributed radio units and centralized baseband units over Ethernet-based networks.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e0598dc8190a6a093e904b9aa70 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:05 p.m.