Triple

T35595412
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Donut Secret 3 E1028616 entity
Predicate hasSecretExitCondition P201753 FINISHED
Object finding hidden key and keyhole LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: finding hidden key and keyhole | Statement: [Donut Secret 3, hasSecretExitCondition, finding hidden key and keyhole]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSecretExitCondition
Context triple: [Donut Secret 3, hasSecretExitCondition, finding hidden key and keyhole]
  • A. hasSecretExit
    Indicates that something includes or is connected to a hidden or concealed way out.
  • B. hasExitFor
    Indicates that something provides or includes a specific exit intended for a particular destination, purpose, or user.
  • C. hasSecretExits
    Indicates that an entity possesses one or more hidden or concealed exits that are not part of its normal, visible access points.
  • D. hasNumberedExit
    Indicates that an entity (such as a road or highway) includes or is associated with an exit that has an assigned number.
  • E. hasNumberOfExits
    Indicates the relationship that specifies how many exits are associated with a given entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e0598dc8190a6a093e904b9aa70 completed May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a001adc8c108190ab3a43f6415e2be3 completed May 10, 2026, 5:42 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a001a290330819097c2c3123f9014b4 completed May 10, 2026, 5:39 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_6a001adbe6588190b7af521508b18898 completed May 10, 2026, 5:42 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:05 p.m.