Triple
T3559069
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | HM Treasury Select Committee |
E75289
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTypeOfProceedings |
P25382
|
FINISHED |
| Object | oral evidence sessions |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: oral evidence sessions | Statement: [HM Treasury Select Committee, hasTypeOfProceedings, oral evidence sessions]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTypeOfProceedings Context triple: [HM Treasury Select Committee, hasTypeOfProceedings, oral evidence sessions]
-
A.
typeOfProceedings
chosen
Indicates the specific category or kind of legal or formal process under which an action or case is being conducted.
-
B.
hasTypeOfCourt
Indicates that an entity is associated with or classified by a specific type or category of court.
-
C.
hasLegalProceeding
Indicates that there is a formal legal action, case, or proceeding involving the related entities.
-
D.
legalProcedureUsed
Indicates that a particular legal procedure or process is applied or employed in relation to a case, action, or legal matter.
-
E.
hasTribunal
Indicates that an entity is associated with or subject to a specific tribunal, such as a court or adjudicative body, that has authority over its cases or matters.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85d45090819086f34fb85d850a1e |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adc0881d50819092332491b9527c9d |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adb834779081908468e182d5f6cf02 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:56 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:20 p.m.