Triple
T35581619
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tic-Tac-Toe |
E1028236
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasStrategyConcept |
P171728
|
FINISHED |
| Object | fork creation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: fork creation | Statement: [Tic-Tac-Toe, hasStrategyConcept, fork creation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasStrategyConcept Context triple: [Tic-Tac-Toe, hasStrategyConcept, fork creation]
-
A.
conceptualStrategy
Indicates a relationship where an entity employs or is associated with an abstract, high-level plan or approach for achieving a goal or solving a problem.
-
B.
hasConcept
Indicates that an entity includes, embodies, or is associated with a particular concept.
-
C.
hasStratotype
Indicates that one entity serves as the designated standard or reference example (stratotype) for defining the stratigraphic characteristics of another entity.
-
D.
hasStrategyType
chosen
Indicates that an entity employs, follows, or is associated with a particular type or category of strategy.
-
E.
hasConceptualStructure
Indicates that one entity embodies, organizes, or is characterized by a particular conceptual structure defined by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e0495a081909beced418558c0b4 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a00053d8004819097ad9cf6431a20a3 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 4:10 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0004b3a82c81908e2bf9a533a93eb6 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 4:08 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:04 p.m.