Triple
T35564143
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 2015 Daytona 500 |
E1027720
|
entity |
| Predicate | differentLeaders |
P183256
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 12 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 12 | Statement: [2015 Daytona 500, differentLeaders, 12]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: differentLeaders Context triple: [2015 Daytona 500, differentLeaders, 12]
-
A.
mainLeaders
Indicates that the referenced entities serve as the primary or most important leaders within a group, organization, or context.
-
B.
leaderType
Indicates the specific role or category of leadership that an entity holds within an organization, group, or context.
-
C.
leader5
Indicates that an entity serves as the primary leader, head, or top authority within a specified group, organization, or context.
-
D.
areLeadersIn
Indicates that the specified entities hold leadership roles or positions of authority within a given group, organization, or context.
-
E.
opposingLeaders
Indicates that two leaders are in opposition to each other, typically representing rival or conflicting sides in a situation or context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e020fd8819081cb080e7e203083 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f79a54aa3c8190b2bb5d790b2d42d4 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:56 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7961970408190b669cc556e30a608 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:38 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f79a53ccc481908421ae16e69aa8a4 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:56 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:04 p.m.