Triple
T35563035
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | C. W. (That Thing You Do!) |
E1027686
|
entity |
| Predicate | workAppearedInDirector |
P119719
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Tom Hanks |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tom Hanks | Statement: [C. W. (That Thing You Do!), workAppearedInDirector, Tom Hanks]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: workAppearedInDirector Context triple: [C. W. (That Thing You Do!), workAppearedInDirector, Tom Hanks]
-
A.
appearsInWorkDirector
chosen
Indicates that an entity appears in a creative work in which the associated director is responsible for directing that work.
-
B.
workOfDirector
Indicates that a creative work (such as a film, play, or show) is directed by a particular director.
-
C.
filmDirectorOfWorkAppearsIn
Indicates that a person is the director of a film in which a particular work (e.g., book, play, or other source material) appears or is featured.
-
D.
filmDirectorOfAppearance
Indicates that a person served as the director for a specific appearance or segment within a film or audiovisual work.
-
E.
hasDirectorOfWork
Indicates that an entity has a specific person or organization serving as the director responsible for overseeing its work or project.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e020fd8819081cb080e7e203083 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f79a54aa3c8190b2bb5d790b2d42d4 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:56 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7961970408190b669cc556e30a608 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:38 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:04 p.m.