Triple
T35556868
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Los Angeles Lakers vs. Boston Celtics |
E1027520
|
entity |
| Predicate | 2010FinalsWinner |
P6604
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Los Angeles Lakers |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Los Angeles Lakers | Statement: [Los Angeles Lakers vs. Boston Celtics, 2010FinalsWinner, Los Angeles Lakers]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: 2010FinalsWinner Context triple: [Los Angeles Lakers vs. Boston Celtics, 2010FinalsWinner, Los Angeles Lakers]
-
A.
finalsLosingTeam
Indicates the team that was defeated in the final match of a competition or tournament.
-
B.
finalsChampion
chosen
Indicates that an entity is the winner or champion of a particular final match, series, or tournament.
-
C.
finalsTeam
Indicates that a team has qualified for and is participating in the final round or championship stage of a competition.
-
D.
undefeatedTeamInFinal
Indicates that a team reached the final match of a competition and did so without having lost any game up to and including that final.
-
E.
finalsLosingCaptain
Indicates that the subject is the captain of a team that lost in a final match or championship game.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e014fd481909e9f04ac603a2aa9 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f79a54aa3c8190b2bb5d790b2d42d4 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:56 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7961970408190b669cc556e30a608 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:38 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:04 p.m.