Triple
T35552579
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Arakwal Indigenous Land Use Agreement area |
E1027402
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLandUseAgreementType |
P38198
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Indigenous Land Use Agreement |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Indigenous Land Use Agreement | Statement: [Arakwal Indigenous Land Use Agreement area, hasLandUseAgreementType, Indigenous Land Use Agreement]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLandUseAgreementType Context triple: [Arakwal Indigenous Land Use Agreement area, hasLandUseAgreementType, Indigenous Land Use Agreement]
-
A.
hasLandClaimAgreement
Indicates that there exists a formal agreement granting or recognizing a party’s rights or claims to a specific piece of land.
-
B.
hasLandUseCharacter
Indicates that one entity possesses or is associated with a particular type or pattern of land use.
-
C.
hasTypeOfAgreement
chosen
Indicates that one entity is associated with, or governed by, a specific category or type of agreement.
-
D.
hasLandUseSystem
Indicates that an entity is associated with or characterized by a particular system or pattern of land use.
-
E.
landUseIncludes
Indicates that a specified land area contains or permits the specified type(s) of land use within its boundaries.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e014fd481909e9f04ac603a2aa9 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff8ba3f8248190bbdf8e7ec2b35093 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 7:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff8b41ba988190a7332e8317d10f09 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 7:30 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:04 p.m.