Triple
T35549887
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement region (US) |
E1027325
|
entity |
| Predicate | implementsAgreementThrough |
P183233
|
FINISHED |
| Object | federal law of the United States |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: federal law of the United States | Statement: [United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement region (US), implementsAgreementThrough, federal law of the United States]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: implementsAgreementThrough Context triple: [United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement region (US), implementsAgreementThrough, federal law of the United States]
-
A.
implementsAgreementWith
Indicates that one party carries out or fulfills the terms of an agreement made with another party.
-
B.
formedByAgreementWith
Indicates that something comes into existence or is established as a direct result of a formal agreement between parties.
-
C.
hasAgreementSystem
Indicates that there exists a specific grammatical agreement system (e.g., for features like number, gender, or person) associated with the given entity.
-
D.
basedOnAgreementWith
Indicates that something exists, is done, or is determined on the basis of a prior agreement or accord between the involved parties.
-
E.
confirmedAgreementBetween
Indicates that a previously proposed agreement between two or more parties has been formally verified, accepted, and is now recognized as valid.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e014fd481909e9f04ac603a2aa9 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f79a54aa3c8190b2bb5d790b2d42d4 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:56 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7961970408190b669cc556e30a608 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:38 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f79a53ccc481908421ae16e69aa8a4 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:56 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:04 p.m.