Triple
T35549630
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | western Kent County |
E1027318
|
entity |
| Predicate | isInRelationTo |
P175131
|
FINISHED |
| Object | central Rhode Island |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: central Rhode Island | Statement: [western Kent County, isInRelationTo, central Rhode Island]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isInRelationTo Context triple: [western Kent County, isInRelationTo, central Rhode Island]
-
A.
inRelationshipWith
Indicates that two entities are mutually involved in a defined personal, romantic, or partnership relationship with each other.
-
B.
haveRelationshipWith
chosen
Indicates that one entity is in some form of defined relationship or association with another entity.
-
C.
occursInRelationTo
Indicates that an event, process, or state takes place in the context of, or with reference to, another specified entity or relationship.
-
D.
relationshipToRelative
Indicates the specific familial connection or kinship role that one person has in relation to a particular relative.
-
E.
allyRelation
Indicates a cooperative, supportive relationship in which the entities act as allies toward shared or aligned goals.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e014fd481909e9f04ac603a2aa9 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f79a54aa3c8190b2bb5d790b2d42d4 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:56 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7961970408190b669cc556e30a608 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:38 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:04 p.m.