Triple
T35536514
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Moldavia |
E1026944
|
entity |
| Predicate | usedChanceryTradition |
P182856
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Slavic chancery tradition |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Slavic chancery tradition | Statement: [Moldavia, usedChanceryTradition, Slavic chancery tradition]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedChanceryTradition Context triple: [Moldavia, usedChanceryTradition, Slavic chancery tradition]
-
A.
usesTradition
chosen
Indicates that one entity employs or draws upon a tradition as a guiding method, resource, or influence in its actions or practices.
-
B.
hasLawTradition
Indicates that one legal system, jurisdiction, or entity follows or is based on a particular legal tradition or family of law.
-
C.
legalTraditionInfluenced
Indicates that one legal tradition has had a formative or shaping influence on the development, principles, or practices of another legal tradition.
-
D.
officeCreatedInTraditionOf
Indicates that an office or position was established following the customs, principles, or institutional model of a prior tradition or precedent.
-
E.
usedCourt
Indicates that an entity made use of or participated in legal proceedings within a particular court.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dff7e508190b28ceeee770dce23 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f79ec355048190af30123ceb6efa2b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:15 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f79e4bdbcc8190be7a0d2cf8a77b64 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:13 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:04 p.m.