Triple

T35520144
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Convention of Klosterzeven E1026529 entity
Predicate commanderHanoverianSide P15834 FINISHED
Object Duke of Cumberland NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Duke of Cumberland | Statement: [Convention of Klosterzeven, commanderHanoverianSide, Duke of Cumberland]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: commanderHanoverianSide
Context triple: [Convention of Klosterzeven, commanderHanoverianSide, Duke of Cumberland]
  • A. commandersSide chosen
    Indicates that one entity is on the same side, faction, or team as the commander in a conflict or competitive context.
  • B. PrussianCommander
    Indicates that an individual holds the position or role of a commander within the Prussian military forces.
  • C. commanderHungarianSide
    Indicates that the subject served as a commander on the Hungarian side in a conflict or military engagement.
  • D. germanCommander
    Indicates that the subject serves as a military commander for German forces in relation to the object.
  • E. commandingOfficerBritishSide
    Indicates that one entity serves as the commanding officer of another entity on the British side in a military context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76dfe78b081908e2b14cb88dd8c00 completed May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd6dbd1b648190b1a0b391c03aebc5 completed May 8, 2026, 4:59 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd6a9020548190bbfa845360ac85fb completed May 8, 2026, 4:46 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:04 p.m.