Triple
T35519823
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | TX60 |
E1026521
|
entity |
| Predicate | underlyingIndexConstituentCount |
P5741
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 60 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 60 | Statement: [TX60, underlyingIndexConstituentCount, 60]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: underlyingIndexConstituentCount Context triple: [TX60, underlyingIndexConstituentCount, 60]
-
A.
underlyingConstituentsType
Indicates the type or category of fundamental components that make up or underlie a given entity or structure.
-
B.
numberOfConstituents
chosen
Indicates the total count of individual components or members that make up a larger whole or group.
-
C.
numberOfConstituentsType
Indicates the type or category used to classify how many constituents (parts or members) are involved in or associated with something.
-
D.
numberOfHoldings
Indicates the quantity of distinct holdings or assets associated with an entity.
-
E.
hasUnderlyingAssets
Indicates that one entity is supported, backed, or derived from another entity or set of entities that serve as its foundational assets.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dfe78b081908e2b14cb88dd8c00 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd592e48cc81909d754cc6c4bd99ae |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:31 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd58b7f9b881909dc099b28d567784 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:30 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:04 p.m.