Triple
T35499762
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | CPVC |
E1025964
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDisadvantageComparedToPVC |
P199589
|
FINISHED |
| Object | higher material cost |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: higher material cost | Statement: [CPVC, hasDisadvantageComparedToPVC, higher material cost]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDisadvantageComparedToPVC Context triple: [CPVC, hasDisadvantageComparedToPVC, higher material cost]
-
A.
disadvantageComparedToHDD
Indicates that one entity is less favorable or performs worse than a hard disk drive (HDD) in some specified aspect or context.
-
B.
advantageOverPlasma
Indicates that one entity possesses a benefit, superiority, or favorable property when compared specifically to plasma.
-
C.
disadvantageComparedToSATA
Indicates that something has a drawback, limitation, or weaker performance when compared to SATA.
-
D.
isStrongerProtectionThan
Indicates that one form of protection provides a higher level of security, defense, or safeguarding compared to another.
-
E.
advantageOverTape
Indicates that one method, material, or approach is considered to have a benefit or superiority when compared specifically to tape.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dfc9c60819089c4217d93922615 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff46afe7e481908f2862ed11c88db2 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff45e9151881909c444a655e852165 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:34 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ff46aefe248190a80d898df6ef1340 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:04 p.m.