Triple

T35486576
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Dolmen Pierre de la Fée E1025612 entity
Predicate approximateUsePeriod P60853 FINISHED
Object late Neolithic LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: late Neolithic | Statement: [Dolmen Pierre de la Fée, approximateUsePeriod, late Neolithic]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: approximateUsePeriod
Context triple: [Dolmen Pierre de la Fée, approximateUsePeriod, late Neolithic]
  • A. activePeriodApproximate
    Indicates that the time span during which an entity was active is known only approximately rather than as precise dates.
  • B. timePeriodApproximation
    Indicates that the associated time period is an estimate or approximation rather than an exact, precise value.
  • C. approximateIntroductionPeriod chosen
    Indicates the approximate time period during which an entity was first introduced or came into use.
  • D. laterUsePeriod
    Indicates that one entity is used or becomes relevant after a specified later time period relative to another.
  • E. hasApproximateUse
    Indicates that one entity is used for a purpose that is similar to, but not exactly the same as, the use or function of another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76dfbcdd881908c7b0b6bc502252b completed May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ff5f5ecc808190b2df364da108ff4c completed May 9, 2026, 4:22 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ff5b84131c8190bf81d7fb53e934bc completed May 9, 2026, 4:06 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:04 p.m.