Triple

T35483461
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Fiat G.91 E1025527 entity
Predicate roleOfVariant Fiat G.91T P188829 FINISHED
Object two-seat trainer LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: two-seat trainer | Statement: [Fiat G.91, roleOfVariant Fiat G.91T, two-seat trainer]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: roleOfVariant Fiat G.91T
Context triple: [Fiat G.91, roleOfVariant Fiat G.91T, two-seat trainer]
  • A. roleOfVariant Fiat G.91R
    Indicates that the subject is a specific role, configuration, or variant of the Fiat G.91R aircraft.
  • B. specificCarrierAircraftVariant
    Indicates that one aircraft variant is a specific version designed or adapted for carrier-based operations of another, more general aircraft variant.
  • C. usesAircraftVariant
    Indicates that one entity operates or employs a specific variant or version of an aircraft.
  • D. isMilitaryVariantOf
    Indicates that one entity is a military-specific version or adaptation of another, typically civilian or general-purpose, entity.
  • E. fuselageVariant
    Indicates that one fuselage is a specific version or variant derived from another fuselage design.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76dfbcdd881908c7b0b6bc502252b completed May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fbad1e94988190b86d447a68e65067 completed May 6, 2026, 9:05 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fba881b8e0819094790935152b99a1 completed May 6, 2026, 8:45 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fbad1b3ba08190ad69e21461333f2e completed May 6, 2026, 9:05 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:04 p.m.