Triple
T35482127
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Alayne Stone |
E1025495
|
entity |
| Predicate | contrastsWithTrueIdentity |
P198327
|
FINISHED |
| Object | LadyOfWinterfell |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: LadyOfWinterfell | Statement: [Alayne Stone, contrastsWithTrueIdentity, LadyOfWinterfell]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: contrastsWithTrueIdentity Context triple: [Alayne Stone, contrastsWithTrueIdentity, LadyOfWinterfell]
-
A.
unawareOfTrueIdentityOf
Indicates that one entity does not know or recognize the real or actual identity of another entity.
-
B.
usesSuperheroIdentity
Indicates that an entity adopts or operates under a superhero persona or alias, rather than their ordinary identity.
-
C.
portrayalDiffersFrom
Indicates that one portrayal of an entity differs in some respect from another portrayal of the same entity.
-
D.
hasImaginedIdentity
Indicates that an entity mentally constructs or adopts a non-actual identity, role, or persona for itself or another entity.
-
E.
resolutionOfIdentity
Indicates that one entity serves as a formal or authoritative statement affirming or clarifying the identity of another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dfadba0819083456aadcd6864ea |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fedd5a5f4c8190acce88db56303703 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 7:08 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fed910b31c8190ae837163d146738d |
completed | May 9, 2026, 6:49 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fedd5915588190bd884054e4be0414 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 7:08 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:04 p.m.