Triple
T35478560
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | IFIP Working Group 2.5 |
E1025404
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | technical committee working group |
C63501
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: technical committee working group Context triple: [IFIP Working Group 2.5, instanceOf, technical committee working group]
-
A.
Technical committee
A technical committee is a group of subject-matter experts formally organized to develop, review, and maintain technical standards, guidelines, or decisions within a specific domain.
-
B.
technical subcommittee
A technical subcommittee is a specialized group within a larger organization tasked with analyzing, developing, and recommending solutions on specific technical issues or standards.
-
C.
technical committee system
A technical committee system is an organized framework that manages the formation, coordination, decision-making, and documentation of expert groups responsible for developing, reviewing, and maintaining technical standards, policies, or solutions within an organization or domain.
-
D.
technical policy working group
A technical policy working group is a cross-functional team of subject-matter experts who collaboratively analyze, develop, and recommend policies on complex technical issues to guide organizational or governmental decision-making.
-
E.
technical expert group
A technical expert group is a team of specialized professionals convened to provide in-depth technical analysis, guidance, and recommendations on specific subject-matter issues.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dfadba0819083456aadcd6864ea |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:04 p.m.