Triple

T35471387
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Exo E1025216 entity
Predicate hasPurposeInLore P97516 FINISHED
Object military combat LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: military combat | Statement: [Exo, hasPurposeInLore, military combat]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPurposeInLore
Context triple: [Exo, hasPurposeInLore, military combat]
  • A. designedPurposeInFiction
    Indicates that something is intentionally created within a fictional context to serve a particular role, function, or narrative purpose.
  • B. primaryFunctionInLore chosen
    Indicates that something’s main role or purpose is defined within a fictional or narrative lore context.
  • C. hasDramaticPurpose
    Indicates that something serves a specific dramatic function or role within a narrative or performance.
  • D. findsPurposeThrough
    Indicates that one entity derives its sense of purpose, meaning, or fulfillment through its relationship with or actions involving another entity.
  • E. hasFictionalBackstory
    Indicates that an entity is associated with an invented or imaginary narrative background rather than a real-world history.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76dfadba0819083456aadcd6864ea completed May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7c29e1b848190b945c6c6120a5330 completed May 3, 2026, 9:48 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7c1b6e7a881908deb96bedb2713f4 completed May 3, 2026, 9:44 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:04 p.m.