Triple
T3543362
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Federal Reserve Bank presidents |
E74937
|
entity |
| Predicate | mayDissentOn |
P48783
|
FINISHED |
| Object | FOMC policy decisions |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: FOMC policy decisions | Statement: [Federal Reserve Bank presidents, mayDissentOn, FOMC policy decisions]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayDissentOn Context triple: [Federal Reserve Bank presidents, mayDissentOn, FOMC policy decisions]
-
A.
dissentingJustice
Indicates that a particular justice disagrees with the majority opinion or decision in a legal case.
-
B.
mayReject
Indicates that one entity has the authority or option to refuse, decline, or not accept another entity or proposal.
-
C.
mayNot
Indicates that an entity is not permitted or is prohibited from performing a particular action or entering into a specified relationship.
-
D.
dissentingOpinionConcern
Indicates that one party holds a differing or opposing view and expresses concern or disagreement regarding another party’s position, decision, or statement.
-
E.
hasDissentingJustice
Indicates that within a judicial decision or ruling, there exists at least one justice who formally disagrees with the majority opinion.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85d274cc8190ab59c97298a1cfbf |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adbf752dd481909226044ffe595338 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:27 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adae15749881909b847c6ca73c934e |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:12 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69adb0a11a1c8190baa8c0eb87ad259a |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:23 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:20 p.m.