Triple
T35402208
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ricky Craven |
E1023264
|
entity |
| Predicate | teamWorkedFor |
P182931
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Hendrick Motorsports |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hendrick Motorsports | Statement: [Ricky Craven, teamWorkedFor, Hendrick Motorsports]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: teamWorkedFor Context triple: [Ricky Craven, teamWorkedFor, Hendrick Motorsports]
-
A.
worksWith
Indicates that two entities collaborate or perform tasks together in a shared work-related context.
-
B.
conferenceOfTeamWorkedFor
Indicates that a conference is associated with, or organized by, a team for which the referenced entity worked.
-
C.
hasCollaboratedIn
Indicates that two or more entities have worked together on a shared project, task, or activity.
-
D.
partnerInWorkOf
Indicates a collaborative relationship where one entity works together with another on a shared task, project, or professional activity.
-
E.
workedUnder
Indicates that one entity was hierarchically subordinate to and performed work under the supervision or authority of another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76df43ca4819098711ca4370f1bb9 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7953c42c4819084cd4eb62b733c2c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:34 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7910770108190bdd39ddb5d304f54 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:16 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f791cad5e08190a8a04ca283dbecaa |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:19 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:03 p.m.