Triple

T35401713
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Choi E1023249 entity
Predicate isCommonInFieldOfNotableBearers P116510 FINISHED
Object literature LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: literature | Statement: [Choi, isCommonInFieldOfNotableBearers, literature]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isCommonInFieldOfNotableBearers
Context triple: [Choi, isCommonInFieldOfNotableBearers, literature]
  • A. hasNotableFieldOfBearers
    Indicates that the entities share a significant or distinguished area of activity, expertise, or achievement associated with their bearers.
  • B. hasNotableBearersType
    Indicates that an entity has notable bearers belonging to a specified type or category.
  • C. hasNotableBearerFamily
    Indicates that a family is recognized for having at least one notable or distinguished member associated with it.
  • D. typicalNameBearers chosen
    Indicates that the subject is a common or characteristic name borne by the entities in the object set.
  • E. hasNotableSingleBearer
    Indicates that the relationship holds when a name, title, or identifier is notably associated with exactly one specific bearer, rather than shared among many.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76df43ca4819098711ca4370f1bb9 completed May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7a225a77c81908f8953ccfeb14336 completed May 3, 2026, 7:29 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7a06d4f108190bae3ab9ae431d2c7 completed May 3, 2026, 7:22 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:03 p.m.