Triple

T35398725
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Countess of Poitiers E1023158 entity
Predicate feudalRankRelative P80950 FINISHED
Object below duchess LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: below duchess | Statement: [Countess of Poitiers, feudalRankRelative, below duchess]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: feudalRankRelative
Context triple: [Countess of Poitiers, feudalRankRelative, below duchess]
  • A. feudalStatus
    Indicates the hierarchical social or legal position an entity holds within a feudal system, such as lord, vassal, or serf.
  • B. rankRelativeToPeerage
    Indicates how an entity’s hierarchical rank compares to that of a specified peer or peer group within a defined ranking system.
  • C. ecclesiasticalRankRelative
    Indicates a hierarchical relationship between two ecclesiastical positions, specifying which rank is higher, lower, or otherwise ordered relative to the other within a church structure.
  • D. nobleRankInHierarchy chosen
    Indicates the relative position or level of a noble title within a structured hierarchy of ranks.
  • E. associatedNobleRank
    Indicates that an entity is linked to or holds a particular noble rank or title.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76df43ca4819098711ca4370f1bb9 completed May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7953827b48190aec5b07f65a3b304 completed May 3, 2026, 6:34 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7910770108190bdd39ddb5d304f54 completed May 3, 2026, 6:16 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:03 p.m.